EU Sovereignty Score

Community trends

See the aggregated results of every completed assessment: how organisations score on average for digital sovereignty, which vendor categories drive the largest risks, and how this shifts over time. Data is k-anonymous and contains no personal information.

What we measure

The score distribution across three bands (0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign: high exposure 0-33, moderate 34-66, sovereign 67-100) and the top vendors per category. Aggregated counters only — never individual assessments.

Privacy

Telemetry is on by default and can be switched off in the footer (opt-out). Vendor counters are merged as 'Other' as soon as a group falls below the k-anonymity threshold. No IPs, no session IDs, no cookies.

The EU sovereignty market in numbers

Aggregated figures from our vendor catalogue, refreshed automatically on every update. Describes the market as this tool models it — not user behaviour.

Vendors in catalogue
6878
Categories covered
96
Open source
16%
GDPR-compliant
72%
EU-only hosting
47%

Did you know

  • 50% of catalogued vendors are headquartered in Europe — the remaining 50% are US-based or elsewhere.
  • 16% are open source — the strongest form of source and runtime sovereignty.
  • 72% claim GDPR compliance; note: this is self-classification, not an audit.
  • 47% offer EU-only hosting — relevant for data-residency requirements under Schrems II.

Headquarters by region

  • Europe (EU/EEA/CH)3430 (50%)
  • United States2537 (37%)
  • Other911 (13%)

Product vs service

  • Software product6870 (100%)
  • Service (MSSP, consultancy, training)8 (0%)

Top 10 countries by vendor count

  • US2538 (37%)
  • DE1007 (15%)
  • FR496 (7%)
  • GB366 (5%)
  • NL327 (5%)
  • CH200 (3%)
  • SE182 (3%)
  • CA135 (2%)
  • ES115 (2%)
  • IT108 (2%)

Categories with the most EU alternatives

Number of EU-headquartered options per category, with coverage percentage.