EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorCompliance & GRCHeadquarters: US

Riskonnect: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Riskonnect is an integrated risk management platform that brings governance, risk and compliance, insurable risk and business continuity into one system. Its Intelligent Risk layer adds AI-supported guidance and task automation. Organisations use the platform to connect risk data, intelligence and decisions across the enterprise, and it is delivered as a cloud service.

Riskonnect, Inc. is a US company, and its privacy notice places its controller in Atlanta, Georgia. The notice states that personal data is stored by the company in the United States, while affiliates in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and India can access it. It relies on standard contractual clauses for international transfers and does not describe an EU data residency option. Its investors include the private equity firms Thoma Bravo and TA Associates. As a US company, Riskonnect can be subject to US legal process, including the CLOUD Act. For a European organisation, the main points are the US storage location and the lack of a stated EU hosting option, so the data processing terms should be reviewed before contracting.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Riskonnect pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
17 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-30
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 11, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model
Vendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting
USVerified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
NoVendor-stated
Category
Compliance & GRC
Type
Product
Website
riskonnect.com ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Riskonnect

The European alternatives to Riskonnect come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

43 European Compliance & GRC vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Riskonnect one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Riskonnect

Riskonnect is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Riskonnect hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Riskonnect is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Riskonnect together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Riskonnect?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Riskonnect include 2B Advice PrIME, Actecil and Adherent. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Riskonnect?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Riskonnect include CISO Assistant. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Riskonnect GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Riskonnect is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. Its GDPR compliance is limited or unclear. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 11, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Compliance & GRC

Compliance & GRC: Governance, risk management, compliance, privacy management and cookie consent. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the Compliance & GRC page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to Riskonnect — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score