EU Sovereignty Score
EU sovereignCybersecurityHeadquarters: FI

Double Open Compliance: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Double Open Compliance is a platform for managing the open-source licence and security compliance of software products, from Double Open Oy in Helsinki, Finland. It is built on the OSS Review Toolkit (ORT): repositories are analysed for dependencies, licences and vulnerabilities, results are curated, and clearances are reused across projects. Reports can support Cyber Resilience Act evidence. It integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Jenkins and comes as hosted SaaS or as an on-premises installation with a support subscription.

It is headquartered in Helsinki; no foreign parent is stated. According to the vendor, data is held in EU-controlled data centres or on the customer's own infrastructure, and Finnish law governs the terms. The underlying stack (ORT, ORT Server, Double Open Server) is open source under Apache-2.0 and MIT, while configuration, clearance data and the MCP server are proprietary. The optional agentic features use the customer's own LLM subscription and are validated on US models, so check where that happens. On-premises, the organisation keeps source code and scan results under its own control.

Sovereignty score
71 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-2100
    Headquartered in the EU: European law applies
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    EU-only hosting
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-360
    Key management with a European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-655
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 15, 2026
Headquarters
FI (EU)Verified by hand
Sovereignty model
Vendor-hosted (EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting
EUVerified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
YesVendor-stated
Category
Type
Product
Website

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Double Open Compliance

The European alternatives to Double Open Compliance come from our knowledge base of over 9,400 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

230 European Cybersecurity vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Double Open Compliance one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with Double Open Compliance

Double Open Compliance is headquartered in FI and therefore falls under European law: the GDPR, NIS2 and the Data Act. No foreign legislation can compel access to your data.

Data is hosted exclusively in the EU, so Double Open Compliance scores best on data residency.

Double Open Compliance is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Double Open Compliance together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Double Open Compliance?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Double Open Compliance include 1Protection.AI, 6cure Threat Protection and Actalis. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Double Open Compliance?

Our list of EU alternatives to Double Open Compliance is mostly commercial options. Browse the category on the map for open-source choices.

Is Double Open Compliance GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Double Open Compliance is headquartered in FI (EU) and hosts data in EU. That makes Double Open Compliance an EU-sovereign choice in its own right; the EU alternatives on this page are comparable European tools.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 15, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Cyber Resilience Act

Public signals that relate to the EU Cyber Resilience Act. They do not count towards the score. A missing line means "not found publicly".

For products in scope of the CRA, CE marking is required from 11 December 2027; this cannot be checked yet.

Checked on October 15, 2026. What is the Cyber Resilience Act?

In the changelog

Earlier changes to this page, as listed in the public changelog.

Digital sovereignty in Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity: Threat detection, endpoint protection, SIEM, vulnerability management. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to Double Open Compliance — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score