EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorCybersecurityHeadquarters: US

Let's Encrypt: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Let's Encrypt is a certificate authority that issues TLS certificates automatically to website operators, using the open ACME protocol described in RFC 8555, so that sites can enable HTTPS without manual steps. Its certificates are publicly recorded, and the CA software that runs the service, Boulder, is published under the Mozilla Public License 2.0.

Let's Encrypt is operated by the Internet Security Research Group, which describes itself as a nonprofit and gives a legal address in San Francisco, California. It is therefore not owned by a commercial company. Its privacy statement names the United States as a place where data may be transferred and processed, and says that service providers are bound by standard contractual clauses under data processing agreements. The statement includes a section on the rights of people in the European Economic Area. European organisations should note that the public service is run by a US nonprofit, while the software can be inspected and reused under its open licence.

Sovereignty score
49 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-30
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-390
    Self-hostable: encryption keys under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-680
    Open source: low switching costs
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-665
    Source code auditable, forkable and self-hostable

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 11, 2026
HeadquartersUS (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decisionOnly for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty modelVendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hostingUSVerified by hand
Open-sourceYesVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantYesVendor-stated
CategoryCybersecurity
TypeProduct
Websiteletsencrypt.org ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Let's Encrypt

The European alternatives to Let's Encrypt come from our knowledge base of over 6,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

93 European Cybersecurity vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Let's Encrypt one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Let's Encrypt hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Let's Encrypt is open source. You can audit the source code, self-host the software and keep the encryption keys under your own control. Switching is easier because data and software are not tied to a single party.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Let's Encrypt together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Let's Encrypt?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Let's Encrypt include Actalis, Advenica and Avira. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Let's Encrypt?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Let's Encrypt include CrowdSec. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Let's Encrypt GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Let's Encrypt is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 11, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Cyber Resilience Act

Public signals that relate to the EU Cyber Resilience Act. They do not count towards the score. A missing line means "not found publicly".

For products in scope of the CRA, CE marking is required from 11 December 2027; this cannot be checked yet.

Checked on October 11, 2026. What is the Cyber Resilience Act?

Digital sovereignty in Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity: Threat detection, endpoint protection, SIEM, vulnerability management. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to Let's Encrypt — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score