EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorTime TrackingHeadquarters: US

Workyard: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Workyard is workforce-management software for construction and field-service businesses. It offers GPS-verified time tracking, job scheduling, cost management and labour-compliance reporting for crews working on site. Employees record time through iOS and Android apps, a web app or a time-clock kiosk, and the data flows into payroll and job-costing workflows. It is delivered as a cloud service, and according to the vendor it serves the United States only.

Workyard Holdings, Inc. is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and its terms are governed by California law. The privacy policy refers to US and California law, does not mention the GDPR, and states that hosting providers' servers may be located in the United States or elsewhere without naming specific locations. Because location data from employees' phones is personal data, a European organisation using it would process worker location data with a US provider under US jurisdiction, including the CLOUD Act, with no published EU hosting option or data-processing terms.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Workyard pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
17 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-30
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 13, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model
Vendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting
USVerified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
NoVendor-stated
Category
Time Tracking
Type
Product
Website
workyard.com ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Workyard

The European alternatives to Workyard come from our knowledge base of over 8,000 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

38 European Time Tracking vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Workyard one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Workyard

Workyard is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Workyard hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Workyard is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Workyard together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Workyard?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Workyard include askDANTE, Beebole and Clockodo. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Workyard?

Our list of EU alternatives to Workyard is mostly commercial options. Browse the category on the map for open-source choices.

Is Workyard GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Workyard is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. Its GDPR compliance is limited or unclear. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 13, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Time Tracking

Time Tracking: Apps for tracking time spent on tasks and projects. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the Time Tracking page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to Workyard — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score