EU Sovereignty Score
Self-hosted / open sourceGIS & GeospatialHeadquarters: US

deck.gl: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

deck.gl is an open-source JavaScript framework for visual exploration of large datasets. It renders layered visualisations on the GPU using WebGL2 and WebGPU, and developers can combine the existing layers or package their own as reusable ones. It works in plain JavaScript or with React, either on its own or on top of base map libraries such as MapLibre, Mapbox, ArcGIS or Google Maps. The project belongs to the vis.gl family of libraries and runs in the browser of whichever application embeds it.

The code is released under the MIT licence and the project is hosted by the OpenJS Foundation, a member-supported non-profit based in the United States. Because deck.gl is a library, there is no vendor-operated cloud: data stays inside the application and on the infrastructure of the organisation that uses it, so the library itself creates no hosting dependency. Sovereignty questions arise mainly from the map tiles, base maps and data services combined with it, which should be chosen separately. The source can be audited, forked and run entirely on your own infrastructure.

Sovereignty score
69 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-390
    Self-hostable: encryption keys under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-680
    Open source: low switching costs
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-665
    Source code auditable, forkable and self-hostable

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 13, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model
Open-source, distributedVerified by hand
Data hosting
USVerified by hand
Open-source
YesVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
NoVendor-stated
Category
Type
Product
Website

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to deck.gl

The European alternatives to deck.gl come from our knowledge base of over 8,000 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

57 European GIS & Geospatial vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is deck.gl one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with deck.gl

deck.gl is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

deck.gl hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

deck.gl is open source. You can audit the source code, self-host the software and keep the encryption keys under your own control. Switching is easier because data and software are not tied to a single party.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs deck.gl together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to deck.gl?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to deck.gl include 52°North, Airbus Defence & Space and Camptocamp. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to deck.gl?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to deck.gl include 52°North and Camptocamp. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is deck.gl GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

deck.gl is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. Its GDPR compliance is limited or unclear. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 13, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in GIS & Geospatial

GIS & Geospatial: Geographic information systems, map visualisation and spatial data analysis. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to deck.gl — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score