EU Sovereignty Score
Self-hosted / open sourceAI SecurityHeadquarters: US

Langkit (WhyLabs): sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

LangKit is an open-source toolkit for monitoring language models. It extracts measurable signals from prompts and responses, such as readability and complexity, similarity between prompt and response, sentiment and toxicity. For security and privacy it counts regular-expression patterns to flag sensitive data such as card and phone numbers, compares text with known jailbreak and prompt-injection examples, and detects refusals. LangKit works with the whylogs data logging library and is installed as a Python package from PyPI. It is a library rather than a hosted service, so you run it in your own environment.

LangKit was developed by WhyLabs, a US company, and is licensed under Apache 2.0. Because the code runs in your own infrastructure, prompts and responses stay there unless you yourself send logs or statistics to an external service. The source code can be inspected and, if needed, forked. The repository does not say whether the project is actively maintained; WhyLabs has since also published the source code of its platform as open source. Check the maintenance status before relying on it in production.

Sovereignty score
69 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    No hosting in Europe (self-hosted)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-390
    Self-hostable: encryption keys under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-680
    Open source: low switching costs
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-665
    Source code auditable, forkable and self-hostable

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 6, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
Ultimate parent company
USVerified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model
Open-source, distributedVerified by hand
Data hosting
self-hostedVerified by hand
Open-source
YesVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
YesVendor-stated
Category
Type
Product
Website

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Langkit (WhyLabs)

The European alternatives to Langkit (WhyLabs) come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

12 European AI Security vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Langkit (WhyLabs) one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with Langkit (WhyLabs)

Langkit (WhyLabs) is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Langkit (WhyLabs) hosts data outside the EU (self-hosted). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Langkit (WhyLabs) is open source. You can audit the source code, self-host the software and keep the encryption keys under your own control. Switching is easier because data and software are not tied to a single party.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Langkit (WhyLabs) together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Langkit (WhyLabs)?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Langkit (WhyLabs) include 2021.AI GRACE, CalypsoAI and Giskard. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Langkit (WhyLabs)?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Langkit (WhyLabs) include Giskard and Mistral Shieldstral. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Langkit (WhyLabs) GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Langkit (WhyLabs) is headquartered in US and hosts data in self-hosted. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 6, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in AI Security

AI Security: Security for AI/LLM systems — prompt-injection detection, AI red-teaming, agentic security posture management and AI governance guardrails. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to Langkit (WhyLabs) — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score