EU Sovereignty Score
Self-hosted / open sourceAI SecurityHeadquarters: US

Llama Guard (Meta): sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Llama Guard is a series of input and output moderation models from Meta, part of the Purple Llama project. The models are meant to screen what a language model receives and returns and to recognise content that violates usage guidelines. Llama Guard 3 is fine-tuned from Llama 3.1 and 3.2 and detects hazards according to the MLCommons taxonomy; versions exist at 8B, 1B and an 11B model with vision support. Developers can adapt the models to their own use case. The weights are distributed through Hugging Face and you run them yourself, for example as part of your own AI pipeline.

Meta is a US company and controls the models and their licence terms. The models are released under the Llama Community License; Meta describes Purple Llama components as permissively licensed, but this is a bespoke licence rather than a standard open-source licence. Because you can run the models in your own environment, prompts and responses need not reach Meta. You do remain dependent on Meta for updates and for any change in licence terms.

Sovereignty score
55 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    No hosting in Europe (self-host)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-380
    Closed source, but self-hostable: encryption keys and runtime under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-645
    Closed source, but self-hostable on your own infrastructure

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 9, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Data hosting
Self-hosted, e.g. in self-host (your choice)Verified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
NoVendor-stated
Category
Type
Product
Website

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Llama Guard (Meta)

The European alternatives to Llama Guard (Meta) come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

12 European AI Security vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Llama Guard (Meta) one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with Llama Guard (Meta)

Llama Guard (Meta) is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Llama Guard (Meta) runs on infrastructure you choose and control yourself. You decide where the data lives, including fully within the EU if you want — this is not a fixed hosting choice made by the vendor.

Llama Guard (Meta) is closed source, but you run the software yourself on your own infrastructure. The encryption keys and the runtime therefore stay under your own control, though you cannot audit or modify the source code. Ask about export options and open standards to limit software-level lock-in.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Llama Guard (Meta) together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Llama Guard (Meta)?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Llama Guard (Meta) include 2021.AI GRACE, CalypsoAI and Giskard. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Llama Guard (Meta)?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Llama Guard (Meta) include Giskard and Mistral Shieldstral. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Llama Guard (Meta) GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Llama Guard (Meta) is headquartered in US and hosts data in self-host. Its GDPR compliance is limited or unclear. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 9, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in AI Security

AI Security: Security for AI/LLM systems — prompt-injection detection, AI red-teaming, agentic security posture management and AI governance guardrails. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to Llama Guard (Meta) — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score