EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorAI SecurityHeadquarters: US

Netskope AI Security: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Netskope AI Security is a set of controls for securing the use and development of generative AI, offered as part of the Netskope platform. It identifies generative-AI applications and applies access policies, and AI Guardrails inspect traffic inline for prompt injection, jailbreaking and content moderation. AI Red Teaming tests systems before deployment. An AI Gateway sits between AI agents and LLM providers and adds authentication, rate limiting, filtering, logging and data loss prevention; further controls cover agent actions and MCP use. Most functions run in the Netskope cloud, while the AI Gateway is also available as a virtual appliance for your own VPC or on-premises environment on AWS or VMware ESXi.

Netskope is headquartered in Santa Clara, California, and is a publicly listed US company, so US law, including the CLOUD Act, can apply. Its community documentation says a tenant can request that inline traffic is processed only in EU data centres. The product is proprietary. These sources do not describe where stored data, such as logs, is kept.

Sovereignty score
27 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-350
    Hosting inside and outside Europe (US, EU)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 6, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model
Vendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting
US, EUVerified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
YesVendor-stated
Category
Type
Product
Website

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Netskope AI Security

The European alternatives to Netskope AI Security come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

12 European AI Security vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Netskope AI Security one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with Netskope AI Security

Netskope AI Security is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Netskope AI Security hosts data in US, EU. Exactly what stays within the EU — and what does not — is defined by the vendor's data processing agreement and sub-processor list, not by a setting you control yourself; check those documents for the precise scope, including backups, logs and support access.

Netskope AI Security is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Netskope AI Security together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Netskope AI Security?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Netskope AI Security include 2021.AI GRACE, CalypsoAI and Giskard. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Netskope AI Security?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Netskope AI Security include Giskard and Mistral Shieldstral. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Netskope AI Security GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Netskope AI Security is headquartered in US and hosts data in US, EU. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 6, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in AI Security

AI Security: Security for AI/LLM systems — prompt-injection detection, AI red-teaming, agentic security posture management and AI governance guardrails. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to Netskope AI Security — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score