EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorEndpoint & Device ManagementHeadquarters: US

Prey: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Prey is a device tracking and management service for laptops, phones and tablets running Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS and Chromebook. Administrators can locate devices, lock or wipe them remotely, sound an alarm, review logs and keep a hardware inventory, and manage the loan and return of shared devices. The company states that it has served IT teams since 2009. The service is delivered as a cloud service with a single administration panel, and breach monitoring is sold as a separate product.

Prey, Inc. names its legal residence as San Francisco, California, United States, in its terms of service. The privacy policy states that the company uses Google Cloud Storage and Amazon Web Services to store user data, without naming regions, and that transfers to the United States rely on the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Because location and device data are held by a US company on US-linked cloud providers, a European organisation should assess US jurisdiction and whether its own data protection requirements allow this data to leave the EU.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Prey pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
17 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-30
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 11, 2026
Headquarters
US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision
Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model
Vendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting
USVerified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
YesVendor-stated
Category
Endpoint & Device Management
Type
Product
Website
preyproject.com ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Prey

The European alternatives to Prey come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

17 European Endpoint & Device Management vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Prey one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Prey

Prey is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Prey hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Prey is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Prey together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Prey?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Prey include Aagon ACMP, AppTec360 and baramundi Management Suite. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Prey?

Our list of EU alternatives to Prey is mostly commercial options. Browse the category on the map for open-source choices.

Is Prey GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Prey is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 11, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Endpoint & Device Management

Endpoint & Device Management: Unified endpoint management, mobile device management, software deployment and workplace policy. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the Endpoint & Device Management page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to Prey — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score