EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorStorage & BackupHeadquarters: US

rsync.net: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

rsync.net is a cloud storage service for offsite backup. It provides an empty UNIX-style filesystem, built on ZFS, that customers reach over SSH. Standard tools such as rsync, scp, sftp, borg, restic, rclone and git-annex can write to it directly, and the service can also copy data from other clouds. It is delivered as a hosted service, so nothing needs to be installed on the customer side.

rsync.net, Inc. is a US-based company with a mailing address in Fairfax, California. Customers choose their storage location; the company names Fremont and Denver in the United States, Zurich in Switzerland and Hong Kong. No EU location is listed, so European organisations that need EU-only storage should confirm the options with the provider. The company publishes a GDPR statement and links to a data processing agreement. As a US-based provider it may be subject to US legal demands regardless of where data is stored, while the Swiss location keeps data outside the EU and EEA.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with rsync.net pre-selected
Sovereignty score
27 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-350
    Hosting inside and outside Europe (US, CH, OTHER)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 11, 2026
HeadquartersUS (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decisionOnly for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty modelVendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hostingUS, CH, OTHERVerified by hand
Open-sourceNoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantYesVendor-stated
CategoryStorage & Backup
TypeProduct
Websitersync.net ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to rsync.net

The European alternatives to rsync.net come from our knowledge base of over 6,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

32 European Storage & Backup vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is rsync.net one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with rsync.net

rsync.net is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

rsync.net hosts data in US, CH, OTHER. Exactly what stays within the EU — and what does not — is defined by the vendor's data processing agreement and sub-processor list, not by a setting you control yourself; check those documents for the precise scope, including backups, logs and support access.

rsync.net is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs rsync.net together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to rsync.net?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to rsync.net include Acronis, Atempo and Bacula Systems. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to rsync.net?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to rsync.net include Bacula Systems, Bareos and BorgBackup. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is rsync.net GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

rsync.net is headquartered in US and hosts data in US, CH, OTHER. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 11, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Storage & Backup

Storage & Backup: Business storage, backup solutions, object storage and data recovery. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also advertise on the Storage & Backup page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to rsync.net — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score