EU Sovereignty Score
Self-hosted / open sourceTesting & QAHeadquarters: DE

Squish: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Squish is a commercial GUI test automation tool for desktop, web, mobile and embedded applications. Test teams use it to automate user-interface tests across these platforms, and it integrates with continuous-integration servers such as Jenkins, GitLab and Bamboo. Its Test Center collects logs, screenshots and metrics from test runs. Squish is sold under commercial licences, and it is installed locally.

Squish is developed by froglogic GmbH, based in Hamburg, Germany. The Qt Company acquired froglogic in 2021, and The Qt Company belongs to Qt Group Plc, which is listed in Finland. Both the developer and the group are European, so the product falls under EU jurisdiction and the ownership involves no non-European parent. The product page does not state where any cloud or log data is stored, and Squish is not presented as open-source software. For a European organisation, Squish is a locally installed, EU-owned option for GUI testing, with its licence terms to be reviewed in the contract.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Squish pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
80 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-2100
    Headquartered in the EU: European law applies
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    EU-only hosting
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-380
    Closed source, but self-hostable: encryption keys and runtime under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-680
    Closed source, but self-hostable on your own infrastructure

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 10, 2026
HeadquartersDE (EU)Verified by hand
Ultimate parent companyFIVerified by hand
Data hostingSelf-hosted, e.g. in EU (your choice)Verified by hand
Open-sourceNoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantNoVendor-stated
CategoryTesting & QA
TypeProduct
Websiteqt.io ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Squish

The European alternatives to Squish come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

29 European Testing & QA vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Squish one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Squish

Squish is headquartered in DE and therefore falls under European law: the GDPR, NIS2 and the Data Act. No foreign legislation can compel access to your data. The ultimate owner is based in FI, also within Europe.

Squish runs on infrastructure you choose and control yourself. You decide where the data lives, including fully within the EU if you want — this is not a fixed hosting choice made by the vendor.

Squish is closed source, but you run the software yourself on your own infrastructure. The encryption keys and the runtime therefore stay under your own control, though you cannot audit or modify the source code. Ask about export options and open standards to limit software-level lock-in.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Squish together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Squish?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Squish include aqua cloud, BTC Embedded Systems and Cantata. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Squish?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Squish include Cerberus Testing and Gatling. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Squish GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Squish is headquartered in DE (EU) and hosts data in EU. That makes Squish an EU-sovereign choice in its own right; the EU alternatives on this page are comparable European tools.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 10, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Testing & QA

Testing & QA: Software testing, test automation, browser testing and quality assurance. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the Testing & QA page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to Squish — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score