EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorPlanning & EPMHeadquarters: US

WorkBoard: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

WorkBoard describes itself as an AI-native platform for strategy execution, covering OKRs, strategic portfolio management and talent management. It supports goal setting, progress tracking and reporting, and offers AI agents for portfolio analysis, leadership coaching and chief-of-staff tasks. In 2025 WorkBoard acquired Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, and Quantive customers are moving to the WorkBoard platform. The service is delivered as a cloud service through a web application.

According to its press release, WorkBoard Inc. is headquartered in Redwood City, California, with offices in the United States, Europe and India. Its investors include SoftBank, Andreessen Horowitz and Microsoft's M12 fund, and no majority owner is stated. As a US company, WorkBoard is subject to US law, including the CLOUD Act, wherever data is stored. Its security page says the service runs on Microsoft Azure in several regions for US and global customers, without naming an EU region. A data processing agreement is available. The software is proprietary.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with WorkBoard pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
17 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-30
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 11, 2026
HeadquartersUS (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decisionOnly for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty modelVendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hostingUSVerified by hand
Open-sourceNoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantYesVendor-stated
CategoryPlanning & EPM
TypeProduct
Websiteworkboard.com ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to WorkBoard

The European alternatives to WorkBoard come from our knowledge base of over 6,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

22 European Planning & EPM vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is WorkBoard one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with WorkBoard

WorkBoard is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

WorkBoard hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

WorkBoard is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs WorkBoard together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to WorkBoard?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to WorkBoard include Board International, CCH Tagetik and CoPlanner. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to WorkBoard?

Our list of EU alternatives to WorkBoard is mostly commercial options. Browse the category on the map for open-source choices.

Is WorkBoard GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

WorkBoard is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 11, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Planning & EPM

Planning & EPM: Budgeting, forecasting, scenario analysis, consolidation and enterprise performance management. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the Planning & EPM page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to WorkBoard — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score