EU Sovereignty Score
EU sovereignE-signaturesHeadquarters: CH

fidentity SIGN: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

fidentity SIGN is a service for signing contracts digitally with qualified electronic signatures (QES). According to the vendor, a QES is equivalent to a handwritten signature in Switzerland (ZertES) and in the EU (eIDAS). The service is aimed at banks, insurers and other companies that need legally binding remote signing. Signers use a smartphone, are identified through the companion IDENT service and then download the signed document, without an app or password. SIGN integrates into existing customer journeys and is offered as a cloud service.

fidentity AG is a Swiss company with offices in Bern. The vendor states that it develops all components itself in Switzerland and names Spicehaus Partners as lead investor, with no foreign majority owner named. For IDENT the vendor says that data and processes stay in a Swiss data centre; the hosting location of SIGN itself is not stated separately, so ask the vendor. Switzerland is not an EU member but is an EFTA country with an EU adequacy decision, and fidentity has an EEA representative under the GDPR.

Sovereignty score
67 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-2100
    Headquartered in Switzerland: Swiss law, recognised by the EU as adequate
  • Data residency SOV-380
    Hosting in Switzerland only (recognised by the EU as adequate)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-360
    Key management with a European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-655
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 14, 2026
Headquarters
CH (EU)Verified by hand
Sovereignty model
Vendor-hosted (EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting
CHVerified by hand
Open-source
NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant
YesVendor-stated
Category
Type
Product
Website

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to fidentity SIGN

The European alternatives to fidentity SIGN come from our knowledge base of over 9,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

78 European E-signatures vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is fidentity SIGN one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Why digital sovereignty matters with fidentity SIGN

fidentity SIGN is headquartered in Switzerland and falls under Swiss law, including the revised Swiss data protection act. Switzerland is not an EU member, but the European Commission recognises its level of data protection as adequate. Its Swiss headquarters does not by itself bring it under US legislation such as the CLOUD Act.

fidentity SIGN hosts data in Switzerland only. Switzerland is not part of the EU or the EEA, so the GDPR does not apply there directly; the European Commission does recognise Swiss data protection as adequate, so personal data can go there without extra safeguards. Our model therefore scores it between EU hosting and hosting outside Europe. If you require strictly EU hosting, take this into account.

fidentity SIGN is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs fidentity SIGN together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to fidentity SIGN?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to fidentity SIGN include A-Trust, Agrello and ANF AC. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to fidentity SIGN?

Our list of EU alternatives to fidentity SIGN is mostly commercial options. Browse the category on the map for open-source choices.

Is fidentity SIGN GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

fidentity SIGN is headquartered in CH (EFTA) and hosts data in CH. That makes fidentity SIGN an EU-sovereign choice in its own right; the EU alternatives on this page are comparable European tools.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 14, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

In the changelog

Earlier changes to this page, as listed in the public changelog.

Digital sovereignty in E-signatures

E-signatures: Electronic signatures, trust services, eIDAS services. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
8 European alternatives to fidentity SIGN — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score