EU Sovereignty Score
Self-hosted / open sourceAI CoworkHeadquarters: US

Browser Use: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Browser Use is an open-source library (MIT licence) that lets AI agents operate a web browser, for Python and TypeScript. You choose the language model yourself, for example from OpenAI, Anthropic or Google, and run the browser locally or in the cloud, including over CDP. It also offers custom tools, structured output, custom system prompts and reuse of browser profiles for authentication. Browser Use Cloud provides hosted browsers, proxies and a hosted agent API.

According to public sources, Browser Use, Inc. is based in San Francisco; the README mentions Zurich and San Francisco. The library runs on your own machine or infrastructure. The cloud services are primarily hosted on AWS; the region is not stated. The DPA describes Browser Use as a processor, with standard contractual clauses for transfers, and an annual SOC 2 Type 2 audit according to the company. Page content and prompts also go to the language model you choose. As a US provider, Browser Use is subject to US jurisdiction.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Browser Use pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
69 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-390
    Self-hostable: encryption keys under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-680
    Open source: low switching costs
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-665
    Source code auditable, forkable and self-hostable

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 10, 2026
HeadquartersUS (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decisionOnly for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty modelOpen-source, distributedVerified by hand
Data hostingUSVerified by hand
Open-sourceYesVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantYesVendor-stated
CategoryAI Cowork
TypeProduct
Websitebrowser-use.com ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Browser Use

The European alternatives to Browser Use come from our knowledge base of over 6,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

20 European AI Cowork vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Browser Use one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Browser Use

Browser Use is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Browser Use hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Browser Use is open source. You can audit the source code, self-host the software and keep the encryption keys under your own control. Switching is easier because data and software are not tied to a single party.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Browser Use together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Browser Use?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Browser Use include Haystack (deepset), Connic and 2501.ai. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Browser Use?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Browser Use include Haystack (deepset), Mistral AI and Nextcloud Assistant. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Browser Use GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Browser Use is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 10, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in AI Cowork

AI Cowork: Autonomous AI desktop agents — multi-step task execution, document processing, workflow automation. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the AI Cowork page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to Browser Use — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score