Non-EU vendorAI CodingHeadquarters: US

Cursor: sovereignty score and 6 European alternatives

Cursor is an AI coding tool from Anysphere, Inc. in which developers plan, write and test software with agents. It offers inline AI edits, agents that work in parallel including cloud agents, code review on GitHub pull requests, and a choice of models from several providers, including Cursor's own. It is delivered as a desktop app, a terminal CLI and a web agent.

Anysphere is based in San Francisco and, since August 2026, is a wholly owned subsidiary of SpaceX, a US company. According to Cursor, requests go through its own backend even with a personal API key and are forwarded to model providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic and SpaceXAI. With Privacy Mode on, Cursor states that customer data is not used for training and that it has zero-data-retention agreements with its providers. European organisations should assess the US jurisdiction and the model providers involved.

See the 6 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Cursor pre-selected

Mastodon LinkedIn Bluesky X Email

Sovereignty score

17 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign

Jurisdiction SOV-210
Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
Data residency SOV-30
No hosting in Europe (US)
Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
Key management with a non-European vendor
Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
Closed source: switching requires data migration
Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 2, 2026

Headquarters	US (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decision	Only for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty model	Vendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hosting	USVerified by hand
Open-source	NoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliant	YesVendor-stated
Hosting signal	AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US (US)Technically measured
Category	AI Coding
Type	Product
Website	cursor.com ↗

The hosting signal shows the network that serves the vendor's website, often a CDN, and not necessarily where the service or your data is hosted. How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Cursor

The European alternatives to Cursor come from our knowledge base of over 6,800 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

6 European AI Coding vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Cursor one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Cursor

Cursor is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Cursor hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

Cursor is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Cursor together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Cursor?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Cursor include Mistral Code, Mistral Vibe CLI and JetBrains AI Assistant. On this page you can compare 6 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Cursor?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Cursor include Mistral Code, Mistral Vibe CLI and SHAI (OVHcloud). These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Cursor GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Cursor is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 2, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in AI Coding

AI Coding: AI-powered code assistants — code completion, terminal agents, AI-native IDEs. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →

Open in the alternatives dashboard Missing a vendor? Submit it Are you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the AI Coding page — with no effect on your score