EU Sovereignty Score
Self-hosted / open sourceBPM & WorkflowHeadquarters: US

Hatchet: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

Hatchet is an orchestration engine for teams that run background tasks, AI agents and durable workflows. The vendor describes it as a platform for orchestrating AI agents, scheduling background tasks and running mission-critical workflows. It is offered as a hosted service, and its core code is published on GitHub under the MIT licence, which allows organisations to run the engine on their own infrastructure.

Hatchet Technologies operates the product, according to the copyright notice on the vendor's website. The company is based in the United States. The vendor states that its global deployments run across the United States and the European Union, but it does not name the hosting provider or the data centres used. For a European organisation, the MIT licence keeps a self-hosted option open on European infrastructure, while the managed service is provided by a US company and falls under US jurisdiction, so the contract and hosting region should be checked before personal data is processed.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with Hatchet pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
71 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-3100
    Hosting inside and outside Europe (US, EU)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-390
    Self-hostable: encryption keys under your own control
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-680
    Open source: low switching costs
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-675
    Source code auditable, forkable and self-hostable

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 11, 2026
HeadquartersUS (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decisionOnly for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty modelOpen-source, distributedVerified by hand
Data hostingUS, EUVerified by hand
Open-sourceYesVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantNoVendor-stated
CategoryBPM & Workflow
TypeProduct
Websitehatchet.run ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to Hatchet

The European alternatives to Hatchet come from our knowledge base of over 6,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

22 European BPM & Workflow vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is Hatchet one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with Hatchet

Hatchet is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

Hatchet hosts data in US, EU. Exactly what stays within the EU — and what does not — is defined by the vendor's data processing agreement and sub-processor list, not by a setting you control yourself; check those documents for the precise scope, including backups, logs and support access.

Hatchet is open source. You can audit the source code, self-host the software and keep the encryption keys under your own control. Switching is easier because data and software are not tied to a single party.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs Hatchet together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to Hatchet?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to Hatchet include Albato, ARIS and Automatisch. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to Hatchet?

Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to Hatchet include Automatisch, Ofelia (Bonita) and Flowable. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.

Is Hatchet GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

Hatchet is headquartered in US and hosts data in US, EU. Its GDPR compliance is limited or unclear. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 11, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in BPM & Workflow

BPM & Workflow: Business process management, workflow automation and process modelling. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the BPM & Workflow page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to Hatchet — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score