EU Sovereignty Score
Non-EU vendorScheduling & BookingHeadquarters: US

OpenTable: sovereignty score and 8 European alternatives

OpenTable is an online restaurant reservation platform. Diners book a table at participating restaurants through a website or app, and restaurants use its management tools to handle reservations and guest data. The service is delivered as a cloud platform used through web browsers and mobile apps. It is aimed at consumers and restaurants, rather than at workplace software or public-sector use.

OpenTable, Inc. is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and is part of the Booking Holdings group. Its privacy policy states that information may be transferred to, or accessed from, entities in other countries, and that the company participates in the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework for transfers from the EU. It publishes a notice for EU and UK residents, and OpenTable GmbH in Berlin is named as EU legal representative under the Digital Services Act. The sources consulted do not state where European guest data is physically stored. The service is proprietary, not open source. For a European organisation, the main points are US jurisdiction and reliance on the Data Privacy Framework for transfers.

See the 8 European alternatives ↓Assess your stack with OpenTable pre-selected
MastodonLinkedInBlueskyXEmail
Sovereignty score
17 / 1000 = high exposure
100 = sovereign
  • Jurisdiction SOV-210
    Headquartered in the US: CLOUD Act and FISA 702
  • Data residency SOV-30
    No hosting in Europe (US)
  • Cryptographic key sovereignty SOV-320
    Key management with a non-European vendor
  • Freedom from lock-in SOV-640
    Closed source: switching requires data migration
  • Source & runtime sovereignty SOV-4 · SOV-615
    Closed source, runtime with the vendor

SOV codes: the matching objective in the European Commission's Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Official source

How the score is calculated

Facts and evidence

Last checked October 10, 2026
HeadquartersUS (US)Verified by hand
EU adequacy decisionOnly for companies individually certified under the EU-US Data Privacy FrameworkVerified by hand
Sovereignty modelVendor-hosted (non-EU)Verified by hand
Data hostingUSVerified by hand
Open-sourceNoVerified by hand
GDPR-compliantYesVendor-stated
CategoryScheduling & Booking
TypeProduct
Websiteopentable.com ↗

How we verify · Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to OpenTable

The European alternatives to OpenTable come from our knowledge base of over 6,200 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.

Score per alternative: 0 = high exposure, 100 = sovereign

39 European Scheduling & Booking vendors are in the catalogue. View the whole category · Submit an alternative · View category on the map

Is OpenTable one of many dependencies?

Score your whole stack in about three minutes. Free, no account needed.

Assess your stack →View a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Why digital sovereignty matters with OpenTable

OpenTable is headquartered in the United States. US vendors fall under the CLOUD Act and FISA 702: US authorities can compel access to data, even when that data sits in a European data centre. That is the core of the jurisdictional exposure in our model.

OpenTable hosts data outside the EU (US). Personal data therefore leaves the EU, which requires a transfer mechanism under the GDPR and pulls the data residency score down.

OpenTable is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.

What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs OpenTable together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best European alternative to OpenTable?

It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to OpenTable include Agendize, Billetto and Bokadirekt. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.

Are there open-source alternatives to OpenTable?

Our list of EU alternatives to OpenTable is mostly commercial options. Browse the category on the map for open-source choices.

Is OpenTable GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?

OpenTable is headquartered in US and hosts data in US. The vendor states it is GDPR-compliant, but the data falls under non-EU jurisdiction. For full EU data residency the EU alternatives on this page usually offer more certainty.

Details and sources

Verified by handHeadquarters, owner, hosting locations and licence have been checked by us against public sources. Free of charge and for every vendor, not a paid label. Nothing in this knowledge base is taken over automatically. Last checked on October 10, 2026.

Sources

Public sources used in the latest check of this record.

Compliance evidence

The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".

No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction

Digital sovereignty in Scheduling & Booking

Scheduling & Booking: Appointment scheduling, online booking systems and calendar management. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.

Also in this category

See all →
Open in the alternatives dashboardMissing a vendor? Submit itAre you this vendor? You can also become a sponsor on the Scheduling & Booking page — with no effect on your score
8 European alternatives to OpenTable — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted · EU Sovereignty Score